[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0950c52f-4b53-a823-a30b-c68bc73671e1@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:51:14 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: marvell-nand: Convert to YAML DT
scheme
On 25/10/2022 08:52, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:25:01 -0400, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 25/10/2022 06:17, Vadym Kochan wrote:
>>> Switch the DT binding to a YAML schema to enable the DT validation.
>>>
>>> Dropped deprecated compatibles and properties described in txt file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v4:
>>> 1) Remove "label" and "partitions" properties
>>
>> I think you did not read the feedback.
>>
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> +
>>> + marvell,system-controller:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> + description: Syscon node that handles NAND controller related registers
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> + "^nand@[0-3]$":
>>> + type: object
>>> + properties:
>>> + reg:
>>> + minimum: 0
>>> + maximum: 3
>>> +
>>> + nand-rb:
>>> + minimum: 0
>>> + maximum: 1
>>> +
>>> + nand-ecc-strength:
>>> + enum: [1, 4, 8]
>>> +
>>> + nand-on-flash-bbt: true
>>> +
>>> + nand-ecc-mode: true
>>> +
>>> + nand-ecc-algo:
>>> + description: |
>>> + This property is essentially useful when not using hardware ECC.
>>> + Howerver, it may be added when using hardware ECC for clarification
>>> + but will be ignored by the driver because ECC mode is chosen depending
>>> + on the page size and the strength required by the NAND chip.
>>> + This value may be overwritten with nand-ecc-strength property.
>>> +
>>> + nand-ecc-step-size:
>>> + description: |
>>> + Marvell's NAND flash controller does use fixed strength
>>> + (1-bit for Hamming, 16-bit for BCH), so the actual step size
>>> + will shrink or grow in order to fit the required strength.
>>> + Step sizes are not completely random for all and follow certain
>>> + patterns described in AN-379, "Marvell SoC NFC ECC".
>>> +
>>> + marvell,nand-keep-config:
>>> + description: |
>>> + Orders the driver not to take the timings from the core and
>>> + leaving them completely untouched. Bootloader timings will then
>>> + be used.
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>> +
>>> + marvell,nand-enable-arbiter:
>>> + description: |
>>> + To enable the arbiter, all boards blindly used it,
>>> + this bit was set by the bootloader for many boards and even if
>>> + it is marked reserved in several datasheets, it might be needed to set
>>> + it (otherwise it is harmless) so whether or not this property is set,
>>> + the bit is selected by the driver.
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>> + deprecated: true
>>> +
>>> + required:
>>> + - reg
>>> + - nand-rb
>>
>> I have no clue why you are doing some random changes. Now you dropped
>> additionalProperties for nand@ about which no one asked you to drop.
>>
>> No. It *must* be here.
>
> Sorry for this mess, I was confused with the "label" and "partitions"
> because I got errors about these properties when I used only
> "additionalProperties: false", so I tried to put reference to partition.yaml.
>
> Then I looked at other nand-controllers schemas and I did not find inclusion of partition.yaml
> for them so I decided to just drop it at all. My understanding is that "additionalProperties:false"
> is needed for nand@ if to have "label" and "partitions" properties, otherwise it is not needed.
A final schema (not used by other schemas) must always finish with
additional/unevaluatedProperties false. You have errors since beginning
- I wrote about it in your first patchset (v1). You had error visible
after adding proper unevaluatedProperties in proper place.
You have partitions node, for partitions. But you reference only *one*
partition.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists