linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib/string.c: Improve strcasecmp speed by not lowering if chars match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7695dbae-0fc6-d53c-5b9f-b3bd7e7fe8f8@prevas.dk>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:55:26 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Nathan Moinvaziri <nathan@...hanm.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/string.c: Improve strcasecmp speed by not lowering if
 chars match

On 25/10/2022 10.00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 4:46 AM Nathan Moinvaziri <nathan@...hanm.com> wrote:
>>
>> From fcb0159ee74908f92adc34143657d8ca56e9a811 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nathan Moinvaziri <nathan@...hanm.com>
>> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:37:59 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] lib/string.c: Improve strcasecmp speed by not lowering if
>>  chars match.
> 
> Why is the above in the commit message?
> 
>> With strings where many characters match exactly each character is needlessly
>> converted to lowercase before comparing. This patch improves the comparison
>> by only converting to lowercase after checking that the characters don't match.
>>
>> The more characters that match exactly the better performance we expect versus
>> the old function.

> You tell us that this is more preformant, but have not provided the
> numbers. Can we see those, please?
> 
> Note, that you basically trash CPU cache lines when characters are not
> equal, and before doing that you have a branching. I'm unsure that
> your way is more performant than the original one.
> 

Are there any code paths in the kernel where strcasecmp performance
matters? strcmp, sure, but strcasecmp or strncasecmp? I don't think so.
If anything, we should nuke the complication in strncasecmp(), and then
make strcasecmp() simply do strncasecmp(a, b, SIZE_MAX).

Rasmus