linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/7] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Remove un-necessary cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:02:50 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     andersson@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     johan@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Remove un-necessary cpumask_empty() check

CPUFreq core will always set the "policy->cpus" bitmask with the bitfield
of the CPU that goes first per domain/policy. So there is no way the
"policy->cpus" bitmask will be empty during qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init().

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index d5ef3c66c762..a5b3b8d0e164 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -552,11 +552,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		data->per_core_dcvs = true;
 
 	qcom_get_related_cpus(index, policy->cpus);
-	if (cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index);
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto error;
-	}
 
 	policy->driver_data = data;
 	policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true;
-- 
2.25.1