[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221025073254.1564622-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:02:49 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: andersson@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: johan@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Supply clock from cpufreq node to CPUs
Qualcomm platforms making use of CPUFreq HW Engine (EPSS/OSM) supply clocks
to the CPU cores. But this relationship is not represented in DTS so far.
So let's make cpufreq node as the clock provider and CPU nodes as the
consumers. The clock index for each CPU node is based on the frequency
domain index.
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index 6c18cfca9a34..8f26cf9aad01 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
L2_0: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ CPU1: cpu@100 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
L2_100: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -87,6 +89,7 @@ CPU2: cpu@200 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
L2_200: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -103,6 +106,7 @@ CPU3: cpu@300 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
L2_300: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -119,6 +123,7 @@ CPU4: cpu@400 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
L2_400: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -135,6 +140,7 @@ CPU5: cpu@500 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
L2_500: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -152,6 +158,7 @@ CPU6: cpu@600 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
L2_600: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -168,6 +175,7 @@ CPU7: cpu@700 {
power-domain-names = "psci";
qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 2>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
+ clocks = <&cpufreq_hw 2>;
L2_700: l2-cache {
compatible = "cache";
next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
@@ -3804,6 +3812,7 @@ cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@...91000 {
<GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "dcvsh-irq-0", "dcvsh-irq-1", "dcvsh-irq-2";
#freq-domain-cells = <1>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
};
gem_noc: interconnect@...00000 {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists