lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221026224640.7542-2-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 01:46:39 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, noralf@...nnes.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] dma-buf: Make locking consistent in dma_buf_detach()

The dma_buf_detach() locks attach->dmabuf->resv and then unlocks
dmabuf->resv, which could be a two different locks from a static
code checker perspective. In particular this triggers Smatch to
report the "double unlock" error. Make the locking pointers consistent.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/Y1fLfsccW3AS%2Fo+%2F@kili/
Fixes: 809d9c72c2f8 ("dma-buf: Move dma_buf_attach() to dynamic locking specification")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index c40d72d318fd..6e33ef4fde34 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -998,9 +998,10 @@ void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 	if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !attach))
 		return;
 
-	dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
 
 	if (attach->sgt) {
+		WARN_ON(dmabuf != attach->dmabuf);
 
 		__unmap_dma_buf(attach, attach->sgt, attach->dir);
 
-- 
2.37.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ