linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] dt-bindings: memory: Factor out common properties of LPDDR bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:04:10 -0700
From:   Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Jian-Jia Su <jjsu@...gle.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] dt-bindings: memory: Factor out common properties
 of LPDDR bindings

> For the future, write cover letter which describes why you are doing
> this. You explained the "why" some time ago in responses, but all such
> information should be in cover letter (plus the applicable part in the
> individual patches).

Sorry, I did write a cover letter here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220831013359.1807905-1-jwerner@chromium.org/

Are you saying I should have kept resending the cover letter on every
new iteration of the series? I thought since we were already
discussing detail questions and there seemed to be no general concerns
on the series as a whole that wouldn't be necessary, but I can keep
resending it next time if you prefer.