linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] dt-bindings: memory: Factor out common properties of LPDDR bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:03:52 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Jian-Jia Su <jjsu@...gle.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] dt-bindings: memory: Factor out common properties
 of LPDDR bindings

On 30/09/2022 18:06, Julius Werner wrote:
> The bindings for different LPDDR versions mostly use the same kinds of
> properties, so in order to reduce duplication when we're adding support
> for more versions, this patch creates a new lpddr-props subschema that
> can be referenced by the others to define these common parts. (This will
> consider a few smaller I/O width and density numbers "legal" for LPDDR3
> that are usually not used there, but this should be harmless.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Julius,

For the future, write cover letter which describes why you are doing
this. You explained the "why" some time ago in responses, but all such
information should be in cover letter (plus the applicable part in the
individual patches).

Grepping through past emails to find "why" is unnecessary burden.

Best regards,
Krzysztof