linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH stable 0/5] Fix missing patches in stable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1lnRm9NZDhIFhwU@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:58:46 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        jason@...c4.com, saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 0/5] Fix missing patches in stable

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:20:01PM -0700, Saeed Mirzamohammadi wrote:
> The following patches has been applied to 6.0 but only patch#2 below
> has been applied to stable. This caused regression with nfs tests in
> all stable releases.
> 
> This patchset backports patches 1 and 3-6 to stable.
> 
> 1. 868941b14441 fs: remove no_llseek
> 2. 97ef77c52b78 fs: check FMODE_LSEEK to control internal pipe splicing
> 3. 54ef7a47f67d vfio: do not set FMODE_LSEEK flag
> 4. c9eb2d427c1c dma-buf: remove useless FMODE_LSEEK flag
> 5. 4e3299eaddff fs: do not compare against ->llseek
> 6. e7478158e137 fs: clear or set FMODE_LSEEK based on llseek function
> 
> For 5.10.y and 5.4.y only, a revert of patch#2 is already included.
> Please apply patch#2, for 5.4.y and 5.10.y as well.

I am sorry, I really do not understand here.

You list these commits in a specific order, yet the patches you send are
in a different order.

And they don't apply to 5.10 or older.

Can you resend proper patch series, for each stable branch that you want
these applied to, so that I can correctly queue them up?

thanks,

greg k-h