[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221026171721.4nfvhamguwnrw6zf@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:17:21 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Shawn Tu <shawnx.tu@...el.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] media: i2c: ov5645: Don't return early on
failures for s_stream(0)
Hi Prabhakar,
thanks for the patch, please see below my comments.
On 22-10-26, Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Make sure we dont stop the code flow in case of errors while stopping
> the stream and return the error code of the first error case if any.
>
> v4l2-core takes care of warning the user so no need to add a warning
> message in the driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> v2->v3
> * Now propagating the first error code in case of failure.
>
> v1->v2
> * New patch
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> index eea3067ddc8b..5702a55607fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> @@ -996,17 +996,22 @@ static int ov5645_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, int enable)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err_rpm_put;
> } else {
> + int stream_off_ret = 0;
> +
> ret = ov5645_write_reg(ov5645, OV5645_IO_MIPI_CTRL00, 0x40);
If this write failed..
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + stream_off_ret = ret;
>
> ret = ov5645_write_reg(ov5645, OV5645_SYSTEM_CTRL0,
> OV5645_SYSTEM_CTRL0_STOP);
why should this write be successful?
Regards,
Marco
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + if (ret < 0 && !stream_off_ret)
> + stream_off_ret = ret;
>
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(ov5645->dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(ov5645->dev);
> +
> + if (stream_off_ret)
> + return stream_off_ret;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists