linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Use 'else' in ufshcd_hba

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a0d265-f9b3-dbc6-edff-396c5a354f92@acm.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:39:56 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     keosung.park@...sung.com, ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Use 'else' in ufshcd_hba_enable()

On 10/26/22 23:20, Keoseong Park wrote:
> Convert if (!ret) { ... } if (ret) { ... } into
> if (!ret) { ... } else { ... }.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 7256e6c43ca6..3b794be53287 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4670,7 +4670,7 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   			ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
>   			if (!ret)
>   				ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
> -			if (ret)
> +			else
>   				dev_err(hba->dev,
>   					"Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n");
>   		}

If ufshcd_hba_enable() is modified it should be converted into the widely
used "if error return" style. How about the untested patch below?

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 05feec10fad3..89f8b86c3f85 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -4668,14 +4668,16 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  		/* enable UIC related interrupts */
  		ufshcd_enable_intr(hba, UFSHCD_UIC_MASK);
  		ret = ufshcd_dme_reset(hba);
-		if (!ret) {
-			ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
-			if (!ret)
-				ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
-			if (ret)
-				dev_err(hba->dev,
-					"Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n");
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(hba->dev, "DME_RESET failed\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+		ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(hba->dev, "Enabling DME failed\n");
+			return ret;
  		}
+		ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
  	} else {
  		ret = ufshcd_hba_execute_hce(hba);
  	}