[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be6395ef27d47b16c3ea9a38e31b4c88@walle.cc>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:00:23 +0200
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dts: ls1028a: sl28: use ocelot-8021q
tagging by default"
Am 2022-10-27 14:40, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> Sorry for sending so many emails. I think the problem we should fix
> first and foremost is that, if there's a user protocol specified in the
> device tree but the kernel fails to load it, it should simply stick
> with
> the default tagging protocol, instead of failing to probe. Everything
> else can be dealt with as a future refinement.
Sounds good to me. Should I come up with a patch or will you do it?
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists