[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221027135427.n3f3v5lhuqwisfik@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:54:28 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: dts: ls1028a: sl28: use ocelot-8021q
tagging by default"
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-10-27 14:40, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
>
> > Sorry for sending so many emails. I think the problem we should fix
> > first and foremost is that, if there's a user protocol specified in the
> > device tree but the kernel fails to load it, it should simply stick with
> > the default tagging protocol, instead of failing to probe. Everything
> > else can be dealt with as a future refinement.
>
> Sounds good to me. Should I come up with a patch or will you do it?
I'll try to prepare a patch and copy you and Heiko. I hope to do that
soon, but I've been running with hardirqs disabled for the past week or
so, and as you can imagine, things are a bit crazy right now and there's
a lot of pending work to do
Powered by blists - more mailing lists