linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add RPMHCC bindings for QDU1000 and QRU1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:54:52 -0700
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add RPMHCC bindings for
 QDU1000 and QRU1000



On 10/27/2022 6:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/10/2022 21:04, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>
>> On 10/27/2022 8:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 26/10/2022 15:04, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>>> Add compatible strings for RPMHCC for QDU1000 and QRU1000.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>> This looks correct except:
>>> 1. redundant bindings in subject
>>> 2. not cc-ing all maintainers
>>>
>>> so still not tag.
>>>
>>>
>> Not sure what you mean by redundant bindings; should I remove
>> "QRU1000"? "Compatible strings"? Please advise.
> In the subject please drop second 'bindings' word, because it is
> redundant so:
>
> dt-bindings: clock: Add RPMHCC for QDU1000 and QRU1000
> or
> dt-bindings: clock: Add QDU1000/QRU1000 RPMHCC
Oh ok that makes sense. Sorry about the confusion.
>
>> Also, I got maintainers from running get_maintainers.pl on
>> linux-next/master; is this wrong? Not sure what I'm missing here.
> You miss some of Qualcomm maintainers. Maybe more, I did not check every
> possible output for every patchset. I just spotted missing Konrad,
> because it sticks out. If you copy the output of some commands, be sure
> you copy everything. Otherwise, just automate it so there will be no
> chances for mistakes.
Ah ok no worries. Will make sure my copy-paste is thorough.

Thanks,
Melody