[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221107171622.nh62m4bf635rl2ae@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:16:22 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Introduce pdc bindings for
QDU1000 and QRU1000
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 02:31:08PM -0700, Melody Olvera wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/2022 11:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Melody Olvera (2022-10-26 12:04:41)
> >> Add compatible fields for QDU1000 and QRU1000 pdcs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> > Is there a reason why this patch continues to be included in what is
> > otherwise a clk driver patch series? Can this patch be sent separately
> > from the clk patches (and not Cced to clk maintainers/list) in the
> > future?
> Sure thing. On reflection, this belongs with the misc support patches.
>
Even better, the "misc" series goes through my tree but this patch is
unrelated. So if you send it on it's own it could just be picked up by
the PDC maintainer (or Rob).
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists