[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a55f582-76ac-3260-6b8b-704f92647d0e@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:53:06 +0530
From: "Rao, Appana Durga Kedareswara" <appanad@....com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Appana Durga Kedareswara rao
<appana.durga.kedareswara.rao@....com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<derek.kiernan@...inx.com>, <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<git@....com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/4] drivers: misc: Add support for TMR Manager
and Inject IPs
Hi Greg,
On 28/10/22 2:39 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:31:02PM +0530, Appana Durga Kedareswara rao wrote:
>> This patch series adds support for TMR Manager and TMR Inject IPs.
>> The TMR Manager is responsible for handling the TMR subsystem state,
>> including fault detection and error recovery. The core is triplicated
>> in each of the sub-blocks in the TMR subsystem, and provides majority
>> voting of its internal state.
>> The TMR Inject core provides functional fault injection by changing
>> selected MicroBlaze instructions, which provides the possibility to
>> verify that the TMR subsystem error detection and fault recovery logic
>> is working properly.
>>
>> For more details about TMR Manager and Inject IPs please refer PG268[1].
>>
>> [1]: https://docs.xilinx.com/r/en-US/pg268-tmr/Triple-Modular-Redundancy-TMR-v1.0-LogiCORE-IP-Product-Guide-PG268
>>
>> Appana Durga Kedareswara rao (4):
>> dt-bindings: misc: tmr-manager: Add device-tree binding for TMR
>> Manager
>> drivers: misc: Add Support for TMR Manager
>> dt-bindings: misc: tmr-inject: Add device-tree binding for TMR Inject
>> drivers: misc: Add Support for TMR Inject IP
>
> Why is this a RESEND?
>
> What happened to the first v5 series? >
Haven't received any review comments for v5 and it's been month that i
have sent v5, so rebased the patches on top of latest tree and resend.
Should i post v6 instead of RESEND?
Regards,
Kedar.
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists