[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1vTo1JG8ZxeDMCX@matsya>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:35:39 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-usb: fix sc8280xp
binding
On 28-10-22, 08:09, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:15:45PM -0400, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 24/10/2022 06:06, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > The current QMP USB PHY bindings are based on the original MSM8996 PCIe
> > > PHY binding which provided multiple PHYs per IP block and these in turn
> > > were described by child nodes.
> > >
> > > The QMP USB PHY block only provide a single PHY and the remnant child
> > > node does not really reflect the hardware.
> > >
> > > The original MSM8996 binding also ended up describing the individual
> > > register blocks as belonging to either the wrapper node or the PHY child
> > > nodes.
> > >
> >
> > (...)
> >
> > > then:
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb-phy.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..95ee81d782f9
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb-phy.yaml
> >
> > Filename based on compatible, so in this case
> > "qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-usb3-uni-phy.yaml", unless it's like the PCI case?
>
> Yes, you're right. Thanks for catching that. This should be the only
> sc8280xp USB PHY compatible so the file name should be updates as you
> suggested.
>
> I'll wait a bit and see if Vinod has any comments before respinning this
> series.
lgtm, pls respin
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists