[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <A23A7058-5598-46EB-8007-C401ADC33149@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 17:57:49 +0800
From: Vee Khee Wong <veekhee@...le.com>
To: michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com
Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, hong.aun.looi@...el.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
tee.min.tan@...el.com, weifeng.voon@...el.com,
yi.fang.gan@...el.com, yoong.siang.song@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] stmmac: intel: Separate ADL-N and RPL-P
device ID from TGL
What is the purpose of this patch?
The function definition looks exactly the same as ‘tgl_sgmii_phy0_data’.
Regards,
Vee Khee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists