[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221030201527.GA23195@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:15:27 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] leds: support to use own workqueue for each
LED
Hi!
> >> This allows to set own workqueue for each LED. This may be useful, because
> >> default 'system_wq' does not guarantee execution order of each work_struct,
> >> thus for several brightness update requests (for multiple leds), real
> >> brightness switch could be in random order.
> >
> > So.. what?
> >
> > Even if execution order is switched, human eye will not be able to
> > tell the difference.
> Hello,
>
> Problem arises on one of our boards where we have 14 triples of leds(each
> triple contains R G B). Test case is to play complex animation on all leds:
> smooth switch from on RGB state to another. Sometimes there are glitches in
> this process - divergence from expectable RGB state. We fixed this by using
> ordered workqueue.
Are there other solutions possible? Like batch and always apply _all_
the updates you have queued from your the worker code?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists