[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03bc76b5-4e2e-5d4d-96b5-53a1f95ffd0c@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 07:01:28 +0000
From: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] leds: support to use own workqueue for each
LED
On 30.10.2022 23:15, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>>> This allows to set own workqueue for each LED. This may be useful, because
>>>> default 'system_wq' does not guarantee execution order of each work_struct,
>>>> thus for several brightness update requests (for multiple leds), real
>>>> brightness switch could be in random order.
>>>
>>> So.. what?
>>>
>>> Even if execution order is switched, human eye will not be able to
>>> tell the difference.
>> Hello,
>>
>> Problem arises on one of our boards where we have 14 triples of leds(each
>> triple contains R G B). Test case is to play complex animation on all leds:
>> smooth switch from on RGB state to another. Sometimes there are glitches in
>> this process - divergence from expectable RGB state. We fixed this by using
>> ordered workqueue.
>
> Are there other solutions possible? Like batch and always apply _all_
> the updates you have queued from your the worker code?
IIUC You, it is possible to do this if brightness update requests are performed using
write to "brightness" file in /sys/class/led/. But if pattern trigger mode is used(in my
case) - I can't synchronize these requests as they are created internally in kernel on
timer tick.
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists