linux-kernel - [PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: cleanup coding style issues with spacing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221031225155.15678-1-jerom.vandersar@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2022 23:51:55 +0100
From:   Jerom van der Sar <jerom.vandersar@...il.com>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     philip.g.hortmann@...il.com, error27@...il.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jerom van der Sar <jerom.vandersar@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: cleanup coding style issues with spacing

Fixed several coding style issues in rtl_cam.c such as double blank lines
and lack of spaces around binary operators. It passes without trivial
warnings about spaces. Some other warnings still remain.

Signed-off-by: Jerom van der Sar <jerom.vandersar@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_cam.c | 25 +++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_cam.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_cam.c
index 41faeb4b9b9b..aeef735679db 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_cam.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_cam.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ void rtl92e_cam_reset(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	u32 ulcommand = 0;
 
-	ulcommand |= BIT31|BIT30;
+	ulcommand |= BIT31 | BIT30;
 	rtl92e_writel(dev, RWCAM, ulcommand);
 }
 
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ void rtl92e_enable_hw_security_config(struct net_device *dev)
 		SECR_value |= SCR_TxUseDK;
 	}
 
-
 	ieee->hwsec_active = 1;
 	if ((ieee->pHTInfo->iot_action & HT_IOT_ACT_PURE_N_MODE) || !hwwep) {
 		ieee->hwsec_active = 0;
@@ -100,33 +99,32 @@ void rtl92e_set_key(struct net_device *dev, u8 EntryNo, u8 KeyIndex,
 	}
 
 	if (DefaultKey)
-		usConfig |= BIT15 | (KeyType<<2);
+		usConfig |= BIT15 | (KeyType << 2);
 	else
-		usConfig |= BIT15 | (KeyType<<2) | KeyIndex;
-
+		usConfig |= BIT15 | (KeyType << 2) | KeyIndex;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < CAM_CONTENT_COUNT; i++) {
 		TargetCommand  = i + CAM_CONTENT_COUNT * EntryNo;
-		TargetCommand |= BIT31|BIT16;
+		TargetCommand |= BIT31 | BIT16;
 
 		if (i == 0) {
-			TargetContent = (u32)(*(MacAddr+0)) << 16 |
-				(u32)(*(MacAddr+1)) << 24 |
+			TargetContent = (u32)(*(MacAddr + 0)) << 16 |
+				(u32)(*(MacAddr + 1)) << 24 |
 				(u32)usConfig;
 
 			rtl92e_writel(dev, WCAMI, TargetContent);
 			rtl92e_writel(dev, RWCAM, TargetCommand);
 		} else if (i == 1) {
-			TargetContent = (u32)(*(MacAddr+2)) |
-				(u32)(*(MacAddr+3)) <<  8 |
-				(u32)(*(MacAddr+4)) << 16 |
-				(u32)(*(MacAddr+5)) << 24;
+			TargetContent = (u32)(*(MacAddr + 2)) |
+				(u32)(*(MacAddr + 3)) <<  8 |
+				(u32)(*(MacAddr + 4)) << 16 |
+				(u32)(*(MacAddr + 5)) << 24;
 			rtl92e_writel(dev, WCAMI, TargetContent);
 			rtl92e_writel(dev, RWCAM, TargetCommand);
 		} else {
 			if (KeyContent != NULL) {
 				rtl92e_writel(dev, WCAMI,
-					      (u32)(*(KeyContent+i-2)));
+					      (u32)(*(KeyContent + i - 2)));
 				rtl92e_writel(dev, RWCAM, TargetCommand);
 				udelay(100);
 			}
@@ -152,7 +150,6 @@ void rtl92e_cam_restore(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	if ((priv->rtllib->pairwise_key_type == KEY_TYPE_WEP40) ||
 	    (priv->rtllib->pairwise_key_type == KEY_TYPE_WEP104)) {
-
 		for (EntryId = 0; EntryId < 4; EntryId++) {
 			MacAddr = CAM_CONST_ADDR[EntryId];
 			if (priv->rtllib->swcamtable[EntryId].bused) {
-- 
2.34.1