| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:16:06 +0900
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: John Thomson <lists@...nthomson.fastmail.com.au>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of
kmalloc
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:08:09PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:39:13PM +0000, John Thomson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022, at 13:55, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 06:42:23PM +0800, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > >> setup_arch() is too early to use slab allocators.
> > >> I think slab received NULL pointer because kmalloc is not initialized.
> > >>
> > >> It seems arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c is using slab too early.
> > >
> > > Cool! it is finally root caused :) Thanks!
> > >
> > > The following patch should solve it and give it a warning message, though
> > > I'm not sure if there is other holes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Feng
> > >
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> > > index 33b1886b06eb..429c21b7ecbc 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> > > @@ -1043,7 +1043,14 @@ size_t __ksize(const void *object)
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> > > void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, size_t size)
> > > {
> > > - void *ret = __kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> > > + void *ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s))) {
> > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > > + return s;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = __kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> > > size, _RET_IP_);
> > >
> > > trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size, s->size, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > index 157527d7101b..85d24bb6eda7 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -3410,8 +3410,14 @@ static __always_inline
> > > void *__kmem_cache_alloc_lru(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru,
> > > gfp_t gfpflags)
> > > {
> > > - void *ret = slab_alloc(s, lru, gfpflags, _RET_IP_, s->object_size);
> > > + void *ret;
> > >
> > > + if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s))) {
> > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > > + return s;
> > > + }
> > > +
Thank you for suggestion!
I think the holes are:
kmalloc_node_trace(), kmem_cache_alloc_node(), __do_kmalloc_node()
And want to suggest:
What about using VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() instead?
> > > + ret = slab_alloc(s, lru, gfpflags, _RET_IP_, s->object_size);
> > > trace_kmem_cache_alloc(_RET_IP_, ret, s, gfpflags, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> >
> > Yes, thank you, that patch atop v6.1-rc3 lets me boot, and shows the warning and stack dump.
> > Will you submit that, or how do we want to proceed?
>
> Thanks for confirming. I wanted to wait for Vlastimil, Hyeonggon and
> other developer's opinion. And yes, I can also post a more formal one.
>
> > transfer started ......................................... transfer ok, time=2.11s
> > setting up elf image... OK
> > jumping to kernel code
> > zimage at: 80B842A0 810B4BC0
> >
> > Uncompressing Linux at load address 80001000
> >
> > Copy device tree to address 80B80EE0
> >
> > Now, booting the kernel...
> >
> > [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.1.0-rc3+ (john@...n) (mipsel-buildroot-linux-gnu-gcc.br_real (Buildroot 2021.11-4428-g6b6741b) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.39) #73 SMP Wed Nov 2 05:10:01 AEST 2022
> > [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/slub.c:3416 kmem_cache_alloc+0x5a4/0x5e8
> > [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #73
> > [ 0.000000] Stack : 810fff78 80084d98 00000000 00000004 00000000 00000000 80889d04 80c90000
> > [ 0.000000] 80920000 807bd328 8089d368 80923bd3 00000000 00000001 80889cb0 00000000
> > [ 0.000000] 00000000 00000000 807bd328 8084bcb1 00000002 00000002 00000001 6d6f4320
> > [ 0.000000] 00000000 80c97d3d 80c97d68 fffffffc 807bd328 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [ 0.000000] 00000000 a0000000 80910000 8110a0b4 00000000 00000020 80010000 80010000
> > [ 0.000000] ...
> > [ 0.000000] Call Trace:
> > [ 0.000000] [<80008260>] show_stack+0x28/0xf0
> > [ 0.000000] [<8070c958>] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80
> > [ 0.000000] [<8002e184>] __warn+0xc4/0xf8
> > [ 0.000000] [<8002e210>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x58/0xa4
> > [ 0.000000] [<801c0fac>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x5a4/0x5e8
> > [ 0.000000] [<8092856c>] prom_soc_init+0x1fc/0x2b4
> > [ 0.000000] [<80928060>] prom_init+0x44/0xf0
> > [ 0.000000] [<80929214>] setup_arch+0x4c/0x6a8
> > [ 0.000000] [<809257e0>] start_kernel+0x88/0x7c0
> > [ 0.000000]
> > [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > [ 0.000000] SoC Type: MediaTek MT7621 ver:1 eco:3
> > [ 0.000000] printk: bootconsole [early0] enabled
> >
> > Thank you for working through this with me.
> > I will try to address the root cause in mt7621.c.
> > It looks like other arch/** soc_device_register users use postcore_initcall, device_initcall,
> > or the ARM DT_MACHINE_START .init_machine. A quick hack to use postcore_initcall in mt7621
> > avoided this zero ptr kmem_cache passed to kmem_cache_alloc_lru.
>
> If IIUC, the prom_soc_init() is only called once in kernel, can the
> 'soc_dev_attr' just be defined as a global data structure instead
> of calling kzalloc(), as its size is small only containing 7 pointers.
But soc_device_registers() too uses kmalloc. I think calling it
after slab initialization will be best solution - if that is correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists