[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <074cfae7-982d-5273-e63e-8db4fa22db14@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 01:16:08 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To: Jinlong Chen <nickyc975@....edu.cn>
CC: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: improve readability of blk_mq_alloc_request()
>> +static struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_nocache(struct request_queue *q,
>> + blk_opf_t opf, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
>
> The name is a bit odd, but I can't think off a better one.
>
>> + struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
>> .q = q,
>> .flags = flags,
>> .cmd_flags = opf,
>> .nr_tags = 1,
>> };
>
> And this now has superflous indenation. Overall, while the separate
> helper looks marginally nicer, I'm not really sure it is worth the
> churn.
existing code is fine here than adding this indentation which
is not worth a churn...
-ck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists