[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221102232437.6e2b1ebd@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 23:24:37 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
Cc: <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace: Fix use-after-free for dynamic ftrace_ops
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 23:23:34 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> I think you misunderstood me. What I was suggesting was to get rid of
> the ftrace_enabled check. The DYNAMIC part is most definitely needed.
>
> if (!command) {
> if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC)
> goto out;
> return 0;
> }
Nevermind, I forgot that the out is before the DYNAMIC check.
;-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists