[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2QmTSfA4qRUarxA@google.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:36:29 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: of: Make use of device_match_of_node()
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Make use of device_match_of_node() instead of open coding its
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index 52616848a37c..4b91e19366a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
> {
> struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec = data;
>
> - return chip->gpiodev->dev.of_node == gpiospec->np &&
> + return device_match_of_node(&chip->gpiodev->dev, gpiospec->np) &&
> chip->of_xlate &&
> chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0;
> }
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists