linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: don't allow a disk link holder to itself

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221103080628.GA3346@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:06:28 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: don't allow a disk link holder to itself

Yes, this is a good one.  Please add a single sentence blurb explaing
the issue before the Test prodecure?

With that this looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:55:40AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> 
> Test procedures:
> 
> 1) dmsetup create test --table "xxx sda", assume dm-0 is created
> 2) dmsetup suspend test
> 3) dmsetup reload test --table "xxx dm-0"
> 4) dmsetup resume test

Can you wire this up for blocktests?

I've also been wondering how we could wire your other two test cases
up as I think they'be very useful.  Hopefully I can find some time
to inject delays with eBPF or something like it.