linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] powerpc module arch checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87leoss7mj.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Thu, 03 Nov 2022 20:35:32 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] powerpc module arch checks

Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:07:31PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Luis if you would be okay for patch 1 to be merged via powerpc or
>> prefer to take it in the module tree (or maybe you object to the
>> code in the first place).
>
> Looks good to me, and nothing on my radar which would cause a conflict
> so happy for you to take it via powerpc or I can take it and apply it
> right away to tricke / get tested on linux-next by tomorrow.
>
> Let me know.

Thanks. I guess it's mostly a nop on other architectures, so probably
makes sense for me to take it.

cheers