[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CO6202HG8VAN.1ROEE25G4KDK2@bobo>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 22:14:16 +1000
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>
To: "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Jessica Yu" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] powerpc/64: Add module check for ELF ABI version
On Thu Nov 3, 2022 at 6:35 PM AEST, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 31/10/2022 à 13:07, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> > Override the generic module ELF check to provide a check for the ELF ABI
> > version. This becomes important if we allow big-endian ELF ABI V2 builds
> > but it doesn't hurt to check now.
> >
> > Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > [np: split patch, added changelog, adjust to Jessica's proposal]
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> > index f6d6ae0a1692..d46bf9bfda26 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,23 @@
> >
> > static LIST_HEAD(module_bug_list);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>
> Can it go in arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c instead ?
>
> > +bool module_elf_check_arch(Elf_Ehdr *hdr)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long abi_level = hdr->e_flags & 0x3;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2)) {
> > + if (abi_level != 2)
> > + return false;
> > + } else {
> > + if (abi_level >= 2)
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return true;
>
> Can be simpler:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2))
> return abi_level == 2;
> else
> return abi_level < 2;
Yes I think both of those can be done. Good suggestions.
Thanks,
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists