lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:27:23 +0800
From:   Lu Wei <luwei32@...wei.com>
To:     <edumazet@...gle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <xemul@...allels.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch net v5] tcp: prohibit TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS if data was already sent

If setsockopt with option name of TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS and opt_code
of TCPOPT_SACK_PERM is called to enable sack after data is sent
and dupacks are received , it will trigger a warning in function
tcp_verify_left_out() as follows:

============================================
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2132
tcp_timeout_mark_lost+0x154/0x160
tcp_enter_loss+0x2b/0x290
tcp_retransmit_timer+0x50b/0x640
tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1c8/0x340
tcp_write_timer+0xe5/0x140
call_timer_fn+0x3a/0x1b0
__run_timers.part.0+0x1bf/0x2d0
run_timer_softirq+0x43/0xb0
__do_softirq+0xfd/0x373
__irq_exit_rcu+0xf6/0x140

The warning is caused in the following steps:
1. a socket named socketA is created
2. socketA enters repair mode without build a connection
3. socketA calls connect() and its state is changed to TCP_ESTABLISHED
   directly
4. socketA leaves repair mode
5. socketA calls sendmsg() to send data, packets_out and sack_outs(dup
   ack receives) increase
6. socketA enters repair mode again
7. socketA calls setsockopt with TCPOPT_SACK_PERM to enable sack
8. retransmit timer expires, it calls tcp_timeout_mark_lost(), lost_out
   increases
9. sack_outs + lost_out > packets_out triggers since lost_out and
   sack_outs increase repeatly

In function tcp_timeout_mark_lost(), tp->sacked_out will be cleared if
Step7 not happen and the warning will not be triggered. As suggested by
Denis and Eric, TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS should be prohibited if data was
already sent.

socket-tcp tests in CRIU has been tested as follows:
$ sudo ./test/zdtm.py run -t zdtm/static/socket-tcp*  --keep-going \
       --ignore-taint

socket-tcp* represent all socket-tcp tests in test/zdtm/static/.

Fixes: b139ba4e90dc ("tcp: Repair connection-time negotiated parameters")
Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@...wei.com>
---
v5: modify the commit message
 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index ef14efa1fb70..54836a6b81d6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -3647,7 +3647,7 @@ int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	case TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS:
 		if (!tp->repair)
 			err = -EINVAL;
-		else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
+		else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED && !tp->bytes_sent)
 			err = tcp_repair_options_est(sk, optval, optlen);
 		else
 			err = -EPERM;
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists