linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221104152732.GA1873068@p14s>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 09:27:32 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        "andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 06:11:46AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping
> > 
> > On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 05:12, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > According to updated reference mannual, the M33 DRAM view of
> > > 0x[C,D]0000000 maps to A55 0xC0000000, so correct it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9222fabf0e39 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support i.MX93")
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 2c471e46f4ca..9fc978e0393c
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att
> > imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > >         { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > >         { 0x90000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > >
> > > -       { 0xC0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > -       { 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > +       { 0xC0000000, 0xC0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > +       { 0xD0000000, 0xC0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > 
> > But how did this work before?  Were some SoC released with the old
> > mapping?

As it is regularly the case, you have not answered all my questions.

> The current m33 firmware release with Linux SDK only has
> TCM version, so I not have image to test the DDR mapping. 
> 
> Initially we got the information that M33 mapping of DRAM.
> DRAM (offset 0 MB)	DRAM	80000000
> DRAM (offset 256 MB)	DRAM	A0000000
> DRAM (offset 512 MB)	DRAM	C0000000
> 
> However the information is wrong after we check more,
> there is an 256MB hole, 0MB [0x80000000, 0x8fffffff],
> 512MB [0xa0000000, 0xafffffff], 
> 1024MB [0xc0000000, 0xcfffffff]
> 
> I use JTAG to confirm it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> > 
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qm[] = {
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >