linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DU0PR04MB9417DF72B41F79CCF63823DF883C9@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:27:58 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        "andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Sent: 2022年11月4日 23:28
> To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> Cc: Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>; andersson@...nel.org;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> festevam@...il.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; linux-
> remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM mapping
> 
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 06:11:46AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct i.MX93 DRAM
> > > mapping
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 05:12, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > >
> > > > According to updated reference mannual, the M33 DRAM view of
> > > > 0x[C,D]0000000 maps to A55 0xC0000000, so correct it.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 9222fabf0e39 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support i.MX93")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 2c471e46f4ca..9fc978e0393c
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > > > @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att
> > > imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > > >         { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > >         { 0x90000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > >
> > > > -       { 0xC0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > > -       { 0xD0000000, 0xa0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > > +       { 0xC0000000, 0xC0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > > > +       { 0xD0000000, 0xC0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > >
> > > But how did this work before?  Were some SoC released with the old
> > > mapping?
> 
> As it is regularly the case, you have not answered all my questions.

The DRAM mapping was not tested, I just wrote them down according
to the information I had.  In this patch, I just fix the mapping at address
0xC0000000, I not add 0xA0000000, I may also add it or use a separate
patch, which would you prefer?

The i.MX93 SoC is still in pre-production phase, and there is no public
Information for now.

Regards,
Peng.
> 
> > The current m33 firmware release with Linux SDK only has TCM version,
> > so I not have image to test the DDR mapping.
> >
> > Initially we got the information that M33 mapping of DRAM.
> > DRAM (offset 0 MB)	DRAM	80000000
> > DRAM (offset 256 MB)	DRAM	A0000000
> > DRAM (offset 512 MB)	DRAM	C0000000
> >
> > However the information is wrong after we check more, there is an
> > 256MB hole, 0MB [0x80000000, 0x8fffffff], 512MB [0xa0000000,
> > 0xafffffff], 1024MB [0xc0000000, 0xcfffffff]
> >
> > I use JTAG to confirm it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peng.
> > >
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qm[] = {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.37.1
> > > >