[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55cdacf5-2b0c-3813-d739-b806db65b052@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 16:55:08 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap1: set ARCH_OMAP1_ANY for ARCH_OMAP1
On 11/6/22 03:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2022, at 11:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2022, at 11:26, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 08:43:50AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ config ARCH_OMAP1_ANY
>>>> select ARCH_OMAP
>>>> def_bool ARCH_OMAP730 || ARCH_OMAP850 || ARCH_OMAP15XX || ARCH_OMAP16XX
>>>>
>>>> -config ARCH_OMAP
>>>> +config ARCH_OMAP1_ANY
>>>
>>> This patch can't be right - look at the first line of context above, you
>>> have symbols that select ARCH_OMAP and you've just removed the
>>> definition of ARCH_OMAP.
>>
>> Right, I misread this, I thought this was an 'if ARCH_OMAP' block
>> instead of the Kconfig symbol. Part of the problem is now is
>> possibly that there are two symbols with that name now, I'll have
>> to try to reproduce the problem first and then see what caused it
>> originally.
>
> It seems the root cause was actually 804f7f19c2e2 ("fbdev: omap:
> avoid using mach/*.h files"), where I started allowing building with
> CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST, but this fails when ARCH_OMAP1_ANY is disabled,
> as Randy correctly found.
>
> We could tighten this gain by adding something like
>
> depends on ARCH_OMAP1_ANY || !OMAP_MUX
>
> to still allow compile-testing but specifically avoiding the
> broken case. I think we have the same problem in the pcmcia and
> spi-uwire drivers, so maybe something like this would be
> a better approach:
>
> --- a/include/linux/soc/ti/omap1-mux.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/ti/omap1-mux.h
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ enum omap1xxx_index {
>
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_MUX) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1_ANY)
> extern int omap_cfg_reg(unsigned long reg_cfg);
> #else
> static inline int omap_cfg_reg(unsigned long reg_cfg) { return 0; }
That seems to work. Push it into -next and see what happens. :)
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists