[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221107170554.7869-2-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:05:52 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/slub: perform free consistency checks before call_rcu
For SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU caches we use call_rcu to perform empty slab
freeing. The rcu callback rcu_free_slab() calls __free_slab() that
currently includes checking the slab consistency for caches with
SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS flags. This check needs the slab->objects field
to be intact.
Because in the next patch we want to allow rcu_head in struct slab to
become larger in debug configurations and thus potentially overwrite
more fields through a union than slab_list, we want to limit the fields
used in rcu_free_slab(). Thus move the consistency checks to
free_slab() before call_rcu(). This can be done safely even for
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU caches where accesses to the objects can still
occur after freeing them.
As a result, only the slab->slab_cache field has to be physically
separate from rcu_head for the freeing callback to work. We also save
some cycles in the rcu callback for caches with consistency checks
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 157527d7101b..99ba865afc4a 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1999,14 +1999,6 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
int order = folio_order(folio);
int pages = 1 << order;
- if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS)) {
- void *p;
-
- slab_pad_check(s, slab);
- for_each_object(p, s, slab_address(slab), slab->objects)
- check_object(s, slab, p, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
- }
-
__slab_clear_pfmemalloc(slab);
__folio_clear_slab(folio);
folio->mapping = NULL;
@@ -2025,9 +2017,17 @@ static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
static void free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
{
- if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU)) {
+ if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS)) {
+ void *p;
+
+ slab_pad_check(s, slab);
+ for_each_object(p, s, slab_address(slab), slab->objects)
+ check_object(s, slab, p, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU))
call_rcu(&slab->rcu_head, rcu_free_slab);
- } else
+ else
__free_slab(s, slab);
}
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists