linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/migrate: make isolate_movable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221107170554.7869-3-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date:   Mon,  7 Nov 2022 18:05:53 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/migrate: make isolate_movable_page() skip slab pages

In the next commit we want to rearrange struct slab fields to allow a larger
rcu_head. Afterwards, the page->mapping field will overlap with SLUB's "struct
list_head slab_list", where the value of prev pointer can become LIST_POISON2,
which is 0x122 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA.  Unfortunately the bit 1 being set can
confuse PageMovable() to be a false positive and cause a GPF as reported by lkp
[1].

To fix this, make isolate_movable_page() skip pages with the PageSlab flag set.
This is a bit tricky as we need to add memory barriers to SLAB and SLUB's page
allocation and freeing, and their counterparts to isolate_movable_page().

Based on my RFC from [2]. Added a comment update from Matthew's variant in [3]
and, as done there, moved the PageSlab checks to happen before trying to take
the page lock.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/208c1757-5edd-fd42-67d4-1940cc43b50f@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aec59f53-0e53-1736-5932-25407125d4d4@suse.cz/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YzsVM8eToHUeTP75@casper.infradead.org/

Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
 mm/migrate.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 mm/slab.c    |  6 +++++-
 mm/slub.c    |  6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 1379e1912772..959c99cff814 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -74,13 +74,22 @@ int isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
 	if (unlikely(!get_page_unless_zero(page)))
 		goto out;
 
+	if (unlikely(PageSlab(page)))
+		goto out_putpage;
+	/* Pairs with smp_wmb() in slab freeing, e.g. SLUB's __free_slab() */
+	smp_rmb();
 	/*
-	 * Check PageMovable before holding a PG_lock because page's owner
-	 * assumes anybody doesn't touch PG_lock of newly allocated page
-	 * so unconditionally grabbing the lock ruins page's owner side.
+	 * Check movable flag before taking the page lock because
+	 * we use non-atomic bitops on newly allocated page flags so
+	 * unconditionally grabbing the lock ruins page's owner side.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(!__PageMovable(page)))
 		goto out_putpage;
+	/* Pairs with smp_wmb() in slab allocation, e.g. SLUB's alloc_slab_page() */
+	smp_rmb();
+	if (unlikely(PageSlab(page)))
+		goto out_putpage;
+
 	/*
 	 * As movable pages are not isolated from LRU lists, concurrent
 	 * compaction threads can race against page migration functions
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 59c8e28f7b6a..219beb48588e 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1370,6 +1370,8 @@ static struct slab *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
 
 	account_slab(slab, cachep->gfporder, cachep, flags);
 	__folio_set_slab(folio);
+	/* Make the flag visible before any changes to folio->mapping */
+	smp_wmb();
 	/* Record if ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS was set when allocating the slab */
 	if (sk_memalloc_socks() && page_is_pfmemalloc(folio_page(folio, 0)))
 		slab_set_pfmemalloc(slab);
@@ -1387,9 +1389,11 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slab *slab)
 
 	BUG_ON(!folio_test_slab(folio));
 	__slab_clear_pfmemalloc(slab);
-	__folio_clear_slab(folio);
 	page_mapcount_reset(folio_page(folio, 0));
 	folio->mapping = NULL;
+	/* Make the mapping reset visible before clearing the flag */
+	smp_wmb();
+	__folio_clear_slab(folio);
 
 	if (current->reclaim_state)
 		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 99ba865afc4a..5e6519d5169c 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1800,6 +1800,8 @@ static inline struct slab *alloc_slab_page(gfp_t flags, int node,
 
 	slab = folio_slab(folio);
 	__folio_set_slab(folio);
+	/* Make the flag visible before any changes to folio->mapping */
+	smp_wmb();
 	if (page_is_pfmemalloc(folio_page(folio, 0)))
 		slab_set_pfmemalloc(slab);
 
@@ -2000,8 +2002,10 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
 	int pages = 1 << order;
 
 	__slab_clear_pfmemalloc(slab);
-	__folio_clear_slab(folio);
 	folio->mapping = NULL;
+	/* Make the mapping reset visible before clearing the flag */
+	smp_wmb();
+	__folio_clear_slab(folio);
 	if (current->reclaim_state)
 		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
 	unaccount_slab(slab, order, s);
-- 
2.38.0