lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:17:26 -0800
From:   Vineet Gupta <vineetg@...osinc.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vineetg@...osinc.com>
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Chris Stillson <stillson@...osinc.com>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/17] riscv: Add vector feature to compile

On 11/7/22 23:56, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 04:04:28PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> +CC Andy, Conor
>>
>> On 11/7/22 09:21, Björn Töpel wrote:
>>>> +config VECTOR
>>>> +	bool "VECTOR support"
>>>> +	depends on GCC_VERSION >= 120000 || CLANG_VERSION >= 130000
>>>> +	default n
>>>> +	help
>>>> +	  Say N here if you want to disable all vector related procedure
>>>> +	  in the kernel.
>>>> +
>>>> +	  If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
>>>> +
>>>> +endmenu
>>> "VECTOR" is not really consistent to how the other configs are named;
>>> RISCV_ISA_V, RISCV_ISA_VECTOR, RISCV_VECTOR?
>>
>> Good point, I've changed it to RISCV_ISA_V to keep it consistent with
>> existing RISCV_ISA_C.
> 
> Hey Vineet, kinda randomly replying here but the wording makes it look
> like you're going to take this patchset on?
> If so, please check out v10 (think it was from April) as there are some
> comments on that version that IIRC remain un-resolved.

Sure thing. Although I only see a few from Christoph and kernel build bot.

-Vineet

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ