linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 04/17] riscv: Add vector feature to compile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2oLkQSdCBJPvZW/@wendy>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:56:01 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Vineet Gupta <vineetg@...osinc.com>
CC:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Chris Stillson <stillson@...osinc.com>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/17] riscv: Add vector feature to compile

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 04:04:28PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> +CC Andy, Conor
> 
> On 11/7/22 09:21, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > > +config VECTOR
> > > +	bool "VECTOR support"
> > > +	depends on GCC_VERSION >= 120000 || CLANG_VERSION >= 130000
> > > +	default n
> > > +	help
> > > +	  Say N here if you want to disable all vector related procedure
> > > +	  in the kernel.
> > > +
> > > +	  If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
> > > +
> > > +endmenu
> > "VECTOR" is not really consistent to how the other configs are named;
> > RISCV_ISA_V, RISCV_ISA_VECTOR, RISCV_VECTOR?
> 
> Good point, I've changed it to RISCV_ISA_V to keep it consistent with
> existing RISCV_ISA_C.

Hey Vineet, kinda randomly replying here but the wording makes it look
like you're going to take this patchset on?
If so, please check out v10 (think it was from April) as there are some
comments on that version that IIRC remain un-resolved.
Thanks,
Conor.