[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2oIcpXINyU2MDL3@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:42:42 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] io_uring/splice: support do_splice_direct
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 04:50:01PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> do_splice_direct() has at least two advantages:
>
> 1) the extra pipe isn't required from user viewpoint, so userspace
> code can be simplified, meantime easy to relax current pipe
> limit since curret->splice_pipe is used for direct splice
>
> 2) in some situation, it isn't good to expose file data via
> ->splice_read() to userspace, such as the coming ublk driver's
> zero copy support, request pages will be spliced to pipe for
> supporting zero copy, and if it is READ, userspace may read
> data of kernel pages, and direct splice can avoid this kind
> of info leaks
Please make this a separate opcode instead of overloading the splice
op with a flag that causes very different behavior and isn't supported
for the regular splice syscall.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists