linux-kernel - Re: patches for staging:media drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2olcaNp3xkRRK7j@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:46:25 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: patches for staging:media drivers

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 10:35:54AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> 
> I don't mind taking patches for media staging drivers as long as:
> 
> 1) they are not for atomisp, and
> 2) they are not for deprecated drivers (drivers/staging/media/deprecated/)
> 

This is unrelated but I somehow misread an email and thought we were
going to create a drivers/deprecated/ directory.  I still think that's a
good idea for future deprecated drivers.  We normally put them in
staging/ but it's not really the ideal place for them.

regards,
dan carpenter