linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gnRNe+k2BEJGnJiWHmWTyb0cxgZ9pMLwMUtU2f=VJv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:54:06 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:21 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Make cmos_do_remove() drop the ACPI RTC fixed event handler so as to
> > prevent it from operating on stale data in case the event triggers
> > after driver removal.
> >
> > While at it, make cmos_do_remove() also clear the driver data pointer
> > of the device and make cmos_acpi_wake_setup() do that in the error path
> > too.
>
> ...
>
> > +     dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>
> > +     dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but the cmos_do_remove() is called by ->remove()
> callback of the real drivers (pnp and platform) and device core is already
> doing this. So, don't know why you need these calls to be explicit.

Good point, but then I guess I should move this patch to the front,
because the issue fixed by it may trigger a use-after-free in
rtc_handler() already.