[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2vl8qXwGOXaky/a@orome>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 18:40:02 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:22:20PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This is a continuation of the previously applied PWM LPSS cleanup series.
> Now, we would like to enable PWM optional feature that may be embedded
> into Intel pin control IPs (starting from Sky Lake platforms).
>
> I would like to route this via Intel pin control tree with issuing
> an immutable branch for both PINCTRL and PWM subsystems, but I'm
> open for other suggestions.
I don't have any objections for this to go through the Intel tree as
long as Uwe is happy with this. Most of this is just reworking existing
things and the stub additions look good to me, so:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists