lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed,  9 Nov 2022 10:24:03 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, maxime@...no.tech,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm283x: Remove bcm2835-rpi-common.dtsi from SoC DTSI

On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:17:38 +0200, maxime@...no.tech wrote:
> According to the commit log of the commit 3ac395a5b3f3 ("ARM: dts:
> bcm283x: Use firmware PM driver for V3D"), the initial intent behind the
> bcm2835-rpi-common DTSI was to share data between the RaspberryPies
> based on the BCM2835, 36 and 37.
> 
> However, it was included by these SoCs' main DTSI. This is creating an
> improper layering.
> 
> On top of that, bcm2835.dtsi is being included by bcm2711.dtsi, which
> means that, even though the bcm2835-rpi-common DTSI wasn't actually
> meant to contain data for the BCM2711, it actually leaks into the
> BCM2711 DTSI.
> 
> In order to remove both issues, let's remove the include of
> bcm2835-rpi-common.dtsi from bcm283{5-7}.dtsi and put them into the
> bcm283{6,7}-rpi.dtsi.
> 
> BCM2835 has to be handled with special care due to the fact that
> bcm2835.dtsi is being included by bcm2711.dtsi. Thus, we chose to
> include bcm2835-rpi-common.dtsi directly into the board DTS. This will
> be more error-prone, but given that it's a fairly old SoC by now, the
> chance that we will get more BCM2835 boards is fairly low.
> 
> BCM2711 isn't modified since the content of bcm2835-rpi-common.dtsi was
> only a power-domain for the v3d that was overridden anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---

Applied to https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux/commits/devicetree/next, thanks!
--
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ