[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08d41457-9405-b869-4b11-6c93e504bd03@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:40:58 -0600
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays
On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Rob,
>
> * Andrew Davis <afd@...com> [221102 00:01]:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
>> TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
>> wanted to test the water with this one.
>>
>> For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
>> will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
>> it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
>> so double checks here very welcome.
>>
>> Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
>
> Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> into dt/next") in Linux next.
>
> Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
>
26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
commit message. This series works on top of either.
Thanks,
Andrew
> Regards,
>
> Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists