linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2ykZpa27FJZXQwt@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:12:38 +0200
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays

* Andrew Davis <afd@...com> [221109 18:31]:
> On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi Andrew & Rob,
> > 
> > * Andrew Davis <afd@...com> [221102 00:01]:
> > > Hello all,
> > > 
> > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> > > wanted to test the water with this one.
> > > 
> > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> > > so double checks here very welcome.
> > > 
> > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> > 
> > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> > into dt/next") in Linux next.
> > 
> > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> > 
> 
> 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
> commit message. This series works on top of either.

Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base?

Regards,

Tony