[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221109111454.w7ikajdugzgsac6g@quack3>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:14:54 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...omium.org>
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bfq: ignore oom_bfqq in bfq_check_waker
On Tue 08-11-22 10:10:30, Khazhismel Kumykov wrote:
> oom_bfqq is just a fallback bfqq, so shouldn't be used with waker
> detection.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index ca04ec868c40..267baf84870f 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2135,7 +2135,9 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> if (!bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq ||
> bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq ||
> bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) ||
> - now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
> + now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC ||
> + bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq ||
> + bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq)
> return;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists