linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] bfq: fix waker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:15:09 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...omium.org>
Cc:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crash

On Tue 08-11-22 10:10:29, Khazhismel Kumykov wrote:
> This fixes crashes in bfq_add_bfqq_busy due to waker_bfqq being NULL,
> but woken_list_node still being hashed. This would happen when
> bfq_init_rq() expects a brand new allocated queue to be returned from
> bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split() and unconditionally updates waker_bfqq
> without resetting woken_list_node. Since we can always return oom_bfqq
> when attempting to allocate, we cannot assume waker_bfqq starts as NULL.
> 
> Avoid setting woken_bfqq for oom_bfqq entirely, as it's not useful.
> 
> Crashes would have a stacktrace like:
> [160595.656560]  bfq_add_bfqq_busy+0x110/0x1ec
> [160595.661142]  bfq_add_request+0x6bc/0x980
> [160595.666602]  bfq_insert_request+0x8ec/0x1240
> [160595.671762]  bfq_insert_requests+0x58/0x9c
> [160595.676420]  blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x11c/0x198
> [160595.682107]  blk_mq_submit_bio+0x270/0x62c
> [160595.686759]  __submit_bio_noacct_mq+0xec/0x178
> [160595.691926]  submit_bio+0x120/0x184
> [160595.695990]  ext4_mpage_readpages+0x77c/0x7c8
> [160595.701026]  ext4_readpage+0x60/0xb0
> [160595.705158]  filemap_read_page+0x54/0x114
> [160595.711961]  filemap_fault+0x228/0x5f4
> [160595.716272]  do_read_fault+0xe0/0x1f0
> [160595.720487]  do_fault+0x40/0x1c8
> 
> Tested by injecting random failures into bfq_get_queue, crashes go away
> completely.
> 
> Fixes: 8ef3fc3a043c ("block, bfq: make shared queues inherit wakers")
> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>

Looks good. Thanks! Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 7ea427817f7f..ca04ec868c40 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -6784,6 +6784,12 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
>  				bfqq = bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd, bic, bio,
>  								 true, is_sync,
>  								 NULL);
> +				if (unlikely(bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq))
> +					bfqq_already_existing = true;
> +			} else
> +				bfqq_already_existing = true;
> +
> +			if (!bfqq_already_existing) {
>  				bfqq->waker_bfqq = old_bfqq->waker_bfqq;
>  				bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq = NULL;
>  
> @@ -6797,8 +6803,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
>  				if (bfqq->waker_bfqq)
>  					hlist_add_head(&bfqq->woken_list_node,
>  						       &bfqq->waker_bfqq->woken_list);
> -			} else
> -				bfqq_already_existing = true;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR