[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2unGf7trHbfPh1v@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 09:11:53 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Restore prints in
arm_smmu_attach_dev()
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:07:13PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The prints for incompatible failures in arm_smmu_attach_dev() might be
> still useful for error diagnosis. As VFIO and IOMMUFD would do testing
> attach() call, having previous dev_err() isn't ideal either.
>
> Add the prints back using dev_dbg().
>
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
You should probably include a fixes line
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists