linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Wait for updated value of WM8962

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:55:46 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, cmo@...exis.com, Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>,
        ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com, shengjiu.wang@....com,
        chi.minghao@....com.cn, ojeda@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        tiwai@...e.com, xiaolei.wang@...driver.com, steve@....org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: wm8962: Wait for updated value of WM8962_CLOCKING1 register

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:13:54 +0800, Chancel Liu wrote:
> DSPCLK_DIV field in WM8962_CLOCKING1 register is used to generate
> correct frequency of LRCLK and BCLK. Sometimes the read-only value
> can't be updated timely after enabling SYSCLK. This results in wrong
> calculation values. Delay is introduced here to wait for newest value
> from register. The time of the delay should be at least 500~1000us
> according to test.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: wm8962: Wait for updated value of WM8962_CLOCKING1 register
      commit: 3ca507bf99611c82dafced73e921c1b10ee12869

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark