linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAOTY__vvjKASUJAGOvL=-WnAq-ji7sfyEEY7j49ty0P7Svvdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 21:42:25 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
        Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
        Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT_DITHER from enum

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> 於 2022年11月9日 週三 晚上7:25寫道：
>
>
>
> On 27/09/2022 17:27, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> > After mmsys and drm change DITHER enum to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
> > mmsys header can remove the useless DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER enum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> > Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>
> Chun-Kuan, I understand you will take this patch through your tree as it depends
> on DRM changes. We can also sync so that I take it once you merged the rest of
> the series. Having vdosys1 series around maybe that's better to avoid merge
> problems.

Hi, Matthias:

I do not hurry to merge patches. To prevent merge conflict, let's
merge step by step.
The drm patches depend on binding document patch, so I would wait for
binding document merged.
After drm patch merged, you could merge this patch.

vdosys1 patches depend on vdosys0 patches, so just let it around.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 3 +--
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > index d2b02bb43768..16ac0e5847f0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
> >       DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR,
> >       DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0,
> >       DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1,
> > -     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
> > -     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0 = DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
> > +     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
> >       DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER1,
> >       DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0,
> >       DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1,