linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: histb: switch to using gpiod API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 07:20:16 -0800
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
CC:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: histb: switch to using gpiod API

On November 11, 2022 7:01:15 AM PST, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:43:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> This patch switches the driver away from legacy gpio/of_gpio API to
>> gpiod API, and removes use of of_get_named_gpio_flags() which I want to
>> make private to gpiolib.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>
>Should I pick this up ? On patch (2/2) I am not sure we reached
>a consensus - please let me know.


Could you pick just this patch (1/2) for now - I owe Pali a respin on the other one, but as far as I remember there was no material disagreement on the patches themselves, just a discussion how to change gpiod API to be more expressive.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry