linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] ufs: core: Remove redundant desc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY5PR04MB6327DF1BBF48BBBC0BFEF64EED029@BY5PR04MB6327.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 13 Nov 2022 13:33:05 +0000
From:   Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] ufs: core: Remove redundant desc_size variable
 from hba

> Hi Arthur,
> 
> Do you think it is better to use kzalloc or kmalloc here? If item in the
> 
> descriptor is not supported by the device, it will be 0x00 and then the
> 
> relevant feature will be marked as disabled or not supported on the
> 
> device feature checkup logic.
> 
Agree, better to use kzalloc. Done.