[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQNTDpKRDdi5JXV1ofC=s9ttJBk4yCivczZ1+KK7G2j5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 22:33:16 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, dzickus@...hat.com, kheib@...hat.com,
jtornosm@...hat.com, ihuguet@...hat.com,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] kbuild: add ability to make source rpm buildable
using koji
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:17 PM Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
>
> Changes:
> - added new target 'srcrpm-pkg' to generate source rpm
> - added required build tools to spec file
> - removed locally compiled host tools to force their re-compile
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
I am fine with this patch.
Just minor comments.
I noticed an inconsistency between
"--target $(UTS_MACHINE)-linux" in the rpm-pkg target and
"--target $(UTS_MACHINE)" in the srcrpm-pkg target.
I applied 6105e4f6511d6b383738be89efb99c607e158a29
just a few months ago.
Is it better to make it consistent here?
Actually, I do not know koji, also not sure if it is
important to mention it in the commit subject.
I just tested this patch by using 'rpmbuild' command
on my local machine.
> ---
> scripts/Makefile.package | 10 ++++++++++
> scripts/package/mkspec | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.package b/scripts/Makefile.package
> index 8bbcced67c22..e0830a870394 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.package
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.package
> @@ -62,6 +62,16 @@ rpm-pkg:
> +rpmbuild $(RPMOPTS) --target $(UTS_MACHINE)-linux -ta $(KERNELPATH).tar.gz \
> --define='_smp_mflags %{nil}'
>
> +# srcrpm-pkg
> +# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +PHONY += srcrpm-pkg
> +srcrpm-pkg:
> + $(MAKE) clean
> + $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKSPEC) >$(objtree)/kernel.spec
> + $(call cmd,src_tar,$(KERNELPATH),kernel.spec)
> + +rpmbuild $(RPMOPTS) --target $(UTS_MACHINE) -ts $(KERNELPATH).tar.gz \
> + --define='_smp_mflags %{nil}' --define='_srcrpmdir $(srctree)'
> +
> # binrpm-pkg
> # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PHONY += binrpm-pkg
> diff --git a/scripts/package/mkspec b/scripts/package/mkspec
> index 70392fd2fd29..dda00a948a01 100755
> --- a/scripts/package/mkspec
> +++ b/scripts/package/mkspec
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ EXCLUDES="$RCS_TAR_IGNORE --exclude=*vmlinux* --exclude=*.mod \
> --exclude=*.o --exclude=*.ko --exclude=*.cmd --exclude=Documentation \
> --exclude=.config.old --exclude=.missing-syscalls.d --exclude=*.s"
>
> +test -n "$LOCALVERSION" && MAKE="$MAKE LOCALVERSION=$LOCALVERSION"
> +
> # We can label the here-doc lines for conditional output to the spec file
> #
> # Labels:
> @@ -49,6 +51,9 @@ sed -e '/^DEL/d' -e 's/^\t*//' <<EOF
> URL: https://www.kernel.org
> $S Source: kernel-$__KERNELRELEASE.tar.gz
> Provides: $PROVIDES
> +$S BuildRequires: bc binutils bison dwarves elfutils-libelf-devel flex
> +$S BuildRequires: gcc make openssl openssl-devel perl python3 rsync
> +
> # $UTS_MACHINE as a fallback of _arch in case
> # /usr/lib/rpm/platform/*/macros was not included.
> %define _arch %{?_arch:$UTS_MACHINE}
> @@ -80,6 +85,8 @@ $S$M against the $__KERNELRELEASE kernel package.
> $S$M
> $S %prep
> $S %setup -q
> +$S rm -f scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/kconfig/conf
> +$S rm -f tools/objtool/{fixdep,objtool}
> $S
> $S %build
> $S $MAKE %{?_smp_mflags} KBUILD_BUILD_VERSION=%{release}
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists